Your single point of reference for all your Geotechnical Inquiries
No reviews have been submitted for this Publication so far.
You must be registered in order to submit a review.
You must be registered in order to submit a review.
Share this Information:
|
|
|
COMPARISON OF PILE DESIGN FOLLOWING TWO STANDARDS: EC7 AND AS2159 (2016)
In normal design practice one method is chosen from the many available and applied to a site. In this paper two case histories are examined, where there is sufficient information to investigate and compare different design methods, including different methods of selecting design parameters. Because the projects are completed, there is information from boreholes and CPTs, from instrumented trial piles, working pile tests and dynamic load tests. Comparisons will include various design methods included in EC7, and also with AS 2159:2009.
Reference:
Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterisation 5 – Lehane, Acosta-Martínez & Kelly (Eds) © 2016 Australian Geomechanics Society, Sydney, Australia, ISBN 978-0-9946261-2-7
Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterisation 5 – Lehane, Acosta-Martínez & Kelly (Eds) © 2016 Australian Geomechanics Society, Sydney, Australia, ISBN 978-0-9946261-2-7
Organization:
National Geotechnical Consulting, Brisbane, Australia
National Geotechnical Consulting, Brisbane, Australia
User Rating:
You must be registered to vote.
